Instead of focusing on WHY so many kinds of people are now being driven to organize opposition to renewed Russian oppression, the author has focused on trying to show that new activists somehow fit into the frameworks of the older, almost defunct OUN and ABN organizations. The only commonality the activists of old and new activists have is that they fought and are fighting for the same personal and national freedoms. The organizations the new activists have or are creating are also new. Why is the author doing this? Is he purposely trying to discredit their work by associating them with the partially tarnished images of OUN and the ABN that Russian propaganda has worked so hard to create?
Instead of focusing on WHY so many kinds of people are now being driven to organize opposition to renewed Russian oppression, the author has focused on trying to show that new activists somehow fit into the frameworks of the older, almost defunct OUN and ABN organizations. The only commonality the activists of old and new activists have is that they fought and are fighting for the same personal and national freedoms. The organizations the new activists have or are creating are also new. Why is the author doing this? Is he purposely trying to discredit their work by associating them with the partially tarnished images of OUN and the ABN that Russian propaganda has worked so hard to create?
because we are dealing here with neo-nazi sentiments.
“The partially tarnished images of OUN …” Ah, I think tens of thousands of dead Poles make it fully tarnished.
Because they are continuing the cause of Nazi Germany and the CIA.....